Consultation on positive discrimination

April 17, 2008 @ A Girl's Guide to Managing Projects from Elizabeth

Vote This Post DownVote This Post Up (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...


Kingsley Napley sends the womenintechnology.co.uk network a quarterly update on employment law, with a focus on how it impacts women in the workplace. One particular item stood out this quarter: a consultation has kicked off about whether or not to repeal equality laws, which is ironic given that a Single Equality Bill is going to be unveiled as part of the Queen’s speech in the autumn. The announcement says:

Harriet Harman, the Minister for Women, has launched a consultation on proposals to repeal legislation preventing potential employers from taking race or sex into consideration when hiring. The plan is described as “positive action” rather than “positive discrimination” - it would not allow a candidate with worse job credentials to be given preferential treatment; the measures would allow race or sex to be taken into consideration when choosing between candidates with exactly the same qualifications.

A similar system currently exists in Norway. The implementation period has now finished on a law that stipulates 40% of directors must be female. The government in have published a list of 12 companies accused of breaking the law by failing to appoint women to 40% of their non-executive board directorships.

New York has just rejected a London-style congestion charge: just because other people are doing it doesn’t make it right. Let’s see what the consultation comes up with and hope people have more sense than to implement this policy.


This article is syndicated from A Girl's Guide to Managing Projects . The original article is available here. Read more in A Girl's Guide to Managing Projects, Project Management News .

No tag for this post.
Popularity: 1%
Reminder : PMToolbox has ZERO tolerance to copyright violation and agrees to follow strictly PMI's Professional Responsibility. That's why each post on this site includes a link to the original version at its source site.

Comments

Got something to say?






[?]